Daisy Duke Wardrobe Malfunction in Season 6

[TXZ045]

During the episdoe about the Fortune Tellers on disc 4 of Season Six. Right after the lil midget guy sneaks in/out of the air-conditioner vent and steals the Boars Nest's money from behind Daisy's back.... when she go's over to the CB to call for help.... her top kinda sorta some how revealed more than just cleavage. I realize this is a 'family' type place here, however, I thought I'd post it up and see what happened just the same. I could have posted it so all you had to do was open the topic to see it, it would have loaded up instantly, but, I made it where a person has to click the url web address to the image instead, this way if you just wanted to read the topic and not see the pic, that would be your choice. Hopefuly this topic wont get deleted... but uh,.... what can I say.... I love Daisy Duke and for years Ive looked for 'Wardrobe malfunctions' and finaly I spotted something worth mentioning. For all I know, its been mentioned before. Or maybe somebody else knows of some other locations of 'wardrobe malfunctions' in during other seasons.....

Anybody who owns Season Six or just has the episode called 'The Fortune Tellers' well, just look at the part where she is going to use the CB, on her approach to the CB, its blatantly obvious what I speak of.
I took a screenshot of it but dont want to get in trouble for posting it. I guess just ask me for it if you wanna see it. Or, if you have the episode in question, find the frames I speak of. Mainly its just like this one frame only, but, there are 2 or 3 frames in all I guess showing more breastage than she prolly intended to show.
.

[TXZ045]

For one.... if you watch the episode called 'Follow That Still'.... in that episode... when Daisy is running along side of the pickup truck about to jump in (just after Luke does the same)... well..... lets just say if you play that part in slow motion, .... you can plainly see more breastage than she prolly intended to be seen.... of course, don't hurt to use a lil 'zoom' also.

[TXZ045]

Anybody ever run across these 'malfunctions' ?

[bwgath]

I never noticed. Perhaps I'll take a look this week end.

[Laura Duke]

Guys,
Come on! I know that it's fun to discuss malfunctions, but this IS a family site! Being a girl, I'm a little upset that we are talking about those types of "malfunctions" in Daisy Duke's wardrobe. Could we please keep these types of clothes disasters to ourselves, or post it in the Hazzard Swamp? I, for one am SO proud of this site for being a fun, family oriented site. Okay, enough said. I don't want anyone to get upset, but like I said, could you please talk about it in the Hazzard Swamp if you HAVE to say it.
Thanks for being considerate about it.
Laura Duke

[RogerDuke]

Nice job Laura. I hope TXZ045 realizes that he's talking about my niece there. I hope he starts focusing on the things that DIDN'T go wrong on the series. You gotta admit, he's got a nice hat though. That part of his wardrobe seems to be functioning just fine. (Even if it wasn't, I wouldn't be focusing on it) I'm gone.

[Laura Duke]

There's my Uncle Jesse!:) Thanks.

Now, TXZ045, please don't take offense to what I was saying. But, please realize that what you type gets read by millions of people. It's a good lesson for all of us to watch what we say and type.

And I agree with Uncle Jesse, or RogerDuke-your can decide which one you prefer. You're hat is awesome.

Keep it 'tween the ditch, ya'll

[General Grant]

Hey Y'all!

I saw Laura Duke and Roger Duke in the same post and couldn't help but look at the post!

Thank You both for letting your true Duke side show. Although I agree (quite strongly, I might add) with both Laura Duke and Roger Duke, I hope that I don't offend either TXZ045 or bwgath when I say that I am not sure what you are seeing when you watch the Dukes, but that is not the type of thing I walk away with when I watch an episode of the Dukes. Anyway, I thought that this was for fans of Catherine Bach, not to post such degrading things about her or her wardrobe. I am sure that if she read that she would feel quite hurt and upset that this is what some of the fans are focusing on. If you have to focus so hard on Cathy, please focus on her nice smile and great personality!

Roger... spoken exactly like Uncle Jesse! I must agree with you both about the hat, it is a nice looking cap!

General Grant

[bwgath]

I wasn't offened. Notice my original post said I hadn't noticed. In other words I wasn't looking for it.

I just stated I'd try to see if I could notice it.

[General Grant]

Hey!

bwgath, I am sorry if I upset you. I just didn't want to offend you because you were kind of in the middle of that entire thing. I hope you are not upset at all. I understand what you message said. I hope that I didn't offend you or anything, that is the last thing I would want to do is to offend a fellow cousin.

My personal opinion: I understand that seeing "malfunctions" is fun, but to me that kind isn't something to go lookin' for! I'll catch y'all later.

General Grant

[RogerDuke]

Hey bwgath, do you know which episode that jump is from (that you use for your avatar?) I know it's early in season 4 because I'm watching those ones now and I just saw it. It might be "Diamonds in the Rough" Of course, some jump scenes were used in more than one episode. I think that the record breaking jump over the creek was used in at least 3 (as well as the beginning song).....

[Laura Duke]

Hey Uncle Jesse (that's my nickname for RogerDuke, in case no one knows),

I think that jump that bwgath had, wasn't the world record jump. If you look in the background, you'll see the ground and a cop car. Didn't the world-record jump happen over a lake or something.

But, then again, it had to land on the ground, sometime. :D So, I could be wrong. Let me know if I am wrong.

Laura Duke

[RogerDuke]

Sorry Laura, I should have worded that better. I knew that bwgath's avatar is not the record setting jump. I was simply using the record jump as an example of a single jump that was used in multiple episodes (due to the cost and time and risk of jumps) I said that because there was a potential that bwgath's avatar jump may have been in more than one episode than the one I just viewed from early in season 4.
Whenever these posts get confusing just remember Waylon's quote, "living in Hazzard might be complicated, but it sure is fun."

[Laura Duke]

Oh, sorry Uncle Jesse! I'm sure that the Uncle Jesse from the Dukes of Hazzard would have said, "Now, young lady, if you don't know what the conversation is about, then you go and high-tail it and go and do your chores! Now, get!" :)

I guess that question wasn't directed to me anyways.:D So, sorry about that. But, that is a neat jump!

Laura Duke

[BoJamesDuke]

That jump was so awsome though...John's gonna try and break that record at Dukesfest 2008...he said on the Graham Norton Show

'No we're not gonna jump it...I'm gonna hire some maniac to do it..."

[bwgath]

Hey!

bwgath, I am sorry if I upset you. I just didn't want to offend you because you were kind of in the middle of that entire thing. I hope you are not upset at all. I understand what you message said. I hope that I didn't offend you or anything, that is the last thing I would want to do is to offend a fellow cousin.

My personal opinion: I understand that seeing "malfunctions" is fun, but to me that kind isn't something to go lookin' for! I'll catch y'all later.

General Grant


Nah, you didn't upset me. I'm just as guilty as the next guy wanting to see Daisy in a not so appropriate way (boy did I ever as a kid!) but never ever looked for it while watching the shows even today. I soak it all in now as I watch it and kind of reminisce about my childhood and remember what a happy time it was. I never really paid much attention to the on camera screw ups and frankly find it hard to believe that it wasn't caught during editing. I was just curious to see if it had. Again, no problem here, it's all good, Yee Haw!

[bwgath]

Hey bwgath, do you know which episode that jump is from (that you use for your avatar?) I know it's early in season 4 because I'm watching those ones now and I just saw it. It might be "Diamonds in the Rough" Of course, some jump scenes were used in more than one episode. I think that the record breaking jump over the creek was used in at least 3 (as well as the beginning song).....


Geesh, good question. I know it is one of the episodes that John, Tom, and Cathy have commentary attached to it as a special feature. I just can't remember which one. I know John points it out right away (it's on the very begining shots of "tonight on the dukes") with a "Whoa!! Look at that! Incredible camera angle" and then he goes on saying how great the camera guys were for getting great angles of stunt shots. My gut tells me that it's the episode from season 3 "and in the is corner, Luke Duke." But be advised my gut has been wrong on several occasions. Great shot though huh?

[General Grant]

Hey bwgath!

I am glad that you are not upset.

Great picture!

General Grant

[TXZ045]

[QUOTE=TXZ045;56496]I realize this is a 'family' type place here, however, I thought I'd post it up and see what happened just the same. I could have posted it so all you had to do was open the topic to see it, it would have loaded up instantly, but, I made it where a person has to click the url web address to the image instead, this way if you just wanted to read the topic and not see the pic, that would be your choice. Hopefuly this topic wont get deleted... but uh,.... what can I say.... I love Daisy Duke and for years Ive looked for 'Wardrobe malfunctions' and finaly I spotted something worth mentioning. For all I know, its been mentioned before. Or maybe somebody else knows of some other locations of 'wardrobe malfunctions' in during other seasons[QUOTE]

I'm not offended by the replies. I am however not in full agree'ance with whats been stated. For one I don't think Cathy would be 'upset' by somebody taking notice of such things. Is that just my 'personal' opinion? well sure it is.
I sent her the screen-shots. I never got any negative reply. I stated in my initial post that I had respect for the fact that this is a 'family' type place. However, I also understand there are human beings here, some of which who happen to be guys, who happen to dig Daisy for more than just her 'smile'.

I watch alot of Dukes and just noticed another 'Wardrobe Malfunction' in Season 5 - Disc 4 - Episode 'The Great Insurance Fraud' Time-Code: 43:04.

Is it because im 'looking' too hard?... or is it simply because I happen to like Daisy and therefore pay 'special' attention to her when she is on-screen?
I dunno, you be the judge of that. But, I cant see the 'wrong' in 'noticing'.
I guess what yall are saying is the part about 'telling' others is whats 'wrong' with 'noticing' would that be correct?

I think if the topic was 'inappropriate' it would have been deleted. Initialy the topic contained urls to jpg's and those links could be clicked and anyone could view the images/screenshots for themselves. I however came back right after posting it and edited the post, removing the url's to the jpgs'.
Reason?: Because I didn't want to 'offend' anyone here.

However it would appear as though, all one has to do is simply 'notice' and then 'tell' others about said things.... and that alone can lead to ppl doing what in my opinion would be classified as 'over-reacting' about next to nothin.
Again, if the mods for this forum had found something wrong with the topic, why would it be here for so many months on end without getting deleted?
Will it get deleted now?..... I dunno, I reckon thats a possibility.... if so, then so be it.

Not offended by your replies, simply offering up a 'action = reaction' response.
I would appreciate it if yall would do the same in reply. Dont take offense to me not seeing things 100% your way, .... You can't please all the people all the time.... so its pointless to try. If we dont see eye to eye on every little single thing, I think thats a positive thing.... after-all, to each their own.

[General Grant]

Hey Y'all
That was very accomodating of you to not put the pictures on the site. Thank you for your thoughtfulness regarding that. It is appreciated. I am glad that you are not offended by any of the replies, that is the last thing us Dukes want to do is offend someone. However, I do feel very strongly on the subject matter. I don't think that we should be posting stuff like this, but if we have to, I think that we 'ought to put it in the Hazzard Swamp.
I certainly hope that Catherine didn't get the shots, I know if I did a respected family show, and someone sent something like that, I would be very upset. But, I am glad she didn't give a negative response. I like to think she has higher standards than stooping so low as to tell someone off.
I understand that we are all human beings, but I certainly hope that looking for wardrobe malfunctions of Daisy, Bo, Luke, or any of the other characters is not why people watch the show. I am aware that other guys are on this site, but I know a few of them to be well mannered, and not all guys have to go looking for stuff like that. Same goes for the girls on this site, too. I just don't think that we should be looking at the Dukes of Hazzard, or any other show, that way. I don't think you should like her for just her smile, you should like people for their personalities, and not be looking at people that way. We should be showing the rest of the world what being a Duke is all about, and I do not think that this is how it is done. Thank you for trying to accomodate everyone and not trying to offend them by removing the urls.
I like to think that this site has high standards, and the moderators seem like great people. I am sure they only delete extremely horrible things, and I would like to think that it would not have to come to that anywhere on this site. However, it is a free country, so you should be able to post it if you feel it is that important, but I think it is both disgusting, and inappropriate. I do not take offense to people giving their opinions, but I think we should do it nicely. As for trying to please people, I believe in that to a point.
I agree with what you are saying about not seein' eye to eye, that is a great thing, if we all thought the same life would be boring.


General Grant

[MaryAnne]

Nope, we haven't deleted this topic because we really don't find it offensive. The Dukes was family oriented, yes, but let's be real. The early episodes had some risque moments (for 1979 anyway) and Daisy's clothes and shorts were risque enough through the whole run of the show. If there are men and boys out there who AREN'T paying attention to Daisy beyond her smile, then there is something seriously wrong with them. ROFL

Afterall, ladies, Bo and Luke went shirtless many times on the show and don't tell me you never noticed. I've always been partial to Bo in those circumstances... :)

I don't think Cathy would really be at all upset about anybody catching whatever wardrobe malfunctions she had on the show. One of the Dukes tv specials (Life and Times or some such) she talks candidly about doing some scene and then turning around and everyone has turned away from her. She thought she had bombed the scene. Then she realized she had fallen out of her shirt. :-o LOL. And speaking from the female point of view, I had often wondered how she managed to keep them in with some of the tops she wore! Turns out it was apparently harder than it looked.

Anyway, we keep things pretty casual and open around here. I've been watching this thread and have let it go. There's some topic threads that are a little more eyebrow raising (without being so bad as to outright violate FCC standards, which are going lower everyday anyway). TX has pointed out already our Moderator Meeting Minutes. Ah, yes, we maintain a high standard here. But we sometimes sink to new highs in lows too.

What I am glad to see is that, although some of y'all don't agree with some things that are posted, you handle yourselves respectfully. Please continue to do so. The three of us can't look at every thread on the forums everyday, but we do make our way around. Don't worry, we'll let ya know if anyone is being totally out of line with anything.

Specifically, TX handled the situation just fine. He posted a topic, put the link to the eva-dence in the topic as opposed to posting the actual photo. You have a choice on whether or not to view the eva-dence submitted. Nobody's making you click on links.

Now, we don't wanna see folks having to check with us all the time about posting stuff because we just don't have the time to do that. Use your best judgement. But also remember, this isn't a forum for The Waltons. This is the Dukes of Hazzard. And if somewhat adult topics and humour offend you, I seriously have to ask what Dukes of Hazzard show have you been watching all these years?

[General Grant]

Thank you MaryAnne for weighing in. I just thinkg that things like this belong better in the Hazzard Swamp. I don't know about everyone else, but I think that we should be setting a better example of what the Dukes is all about, and I do not think that looking at the characters in that manner is how to do it.
I know that I have always (and still do) disagreed with some of the clothing choices of the Dukes, and always felt that it was a family show, so they should dress the part. I do apreciate the casual and openness of the site, and I would not want any of the stuff to get deleted, it is just that I think that the subject matter has upset a couple of people, so I would think that common sense and courtesy would begin to kick in, and it would be at least taken to the Hazzard Swamp.
At least when Cathy fell out of her shirt, every one looked away! I have always veiwed the Dukes to have a real family values and high moral sense to them, I am not sure, but I do not think that looking for stuff like that is very family oriented. It does not offend me that there is a post here about that, it is the whole idea that there are Duke fans out there doing that, and sending links that gets me. What happened to high moral values?

I do not know about y'all, but the Dukes I have been watching is one that shows the real value of family, and one that for 48 minutes, you can feel like you are somewhere you belong, and you can always find a friend.
General Grant

[TXZ045]

I whole heartedly disagree with just about everything you said. We are all human. And humans will act like humans. We can all put up a front, or put on our 'family values' face, but in reality, we all know damn well whats up when it comes to a topic such as this.

What about Enos looking at Daisy's legs in a 'lustful' way? when she was in jail on her fake birthday and Luke was bringing her some fake presents...
Whats the different in that and or any other person on the show or off the show lusting after Daisy.

What about the numerous comments Bo and or Luke themselves made about Daisy's curves.... Bo saying something about if Daisy wasn't his cousin, he would marry her and her replying that had never stopped anbody in this family before.

There is some clear-cut shiftyness on that show.... and as pointed about by the mod especialy in the early episodes some of the T&A was so blatant it could not go unrecognized.... and it remained persistent through-out the show only it was 'toned-down' as the seasons went on.

We can all try to ignore the obvious/reality of the situation, or we can put up a front and claim we don't notice the 'obvious'. I for one have no shame in saying what I think/see and Love about Daisy Duke.

It is my 'personal opinion' this thread should not be moved and should remain right where it is at. However, if the mod(s) see fit to remove/move it, I reckon thats what will happen as they obviously call the shots around here.

With all due respect General Grant, your opinions are appreciated, however, I disagree with you and or anyone else who would attempt to deny the obviously blatant reality of the Daisy and her physicaly appealing curves.

[Laura Duke]

First of all, I would like to thank everyone for how they have handled this. I know that from all sides, this is a very difficult situation, and one that everyone feels very strongly about. I hope that no one has upset feelings, and all will work out happily for everyone in the end.

I know that no one really wants to hear from me, and I apologize. Because, once again, I'm putting down how I feel. Please bear with me, because a lot has happened, and I might jump around a bit. Plus, the great thing about posts is you can always skip how I feel if I get a bit long-winded!:lol:

Also, may I clear something up? I really do try to not come off as "Miss Perfect." I am aware that there are people in this life that will not agree with me, and I have never had a problem with that, as long as it is a healthy debate. And, I never expect anyone to bow down to my wishes. If I EVER came off as that, my humblest apologies. I am not the best at words and expressing myself through typing. Although I may try to not come off as a hot-head, sometimes I type that way, which I certainly don't want to do. Also, I know that all of you are really great at letting others weigh-in on how they feel, so I can feel safe in posting how I feel and that I'll be treated with respect.

I also do agree that the type of clothing that Daisy has is not always the greatest. Even though I'm a girl, the clothes she has on, you can't help but notice, it's ridiculous sometimes! But, I was just a little taken-aback when it was mentioned. Sorry, I can't think of a nicer way to say that.

Being honest here, yes I have noticed Bo and Luke shirtless. Like it was mentioned, how could you not notice? But, it's not a huge deal. There shirts off, and I just continue watching the show. Personally, I don't find it exciting to zoom in on his butt. Or, I don't try to look and see if his pants are lower than usual. Sorry, that sounds really rude. And, I'm not trying to pin down any one person, but I'm trying to explain myself so you don't think I'm crazier than you think already!8-) Also, I tend to agree, Daisy is beautiful! Heck, I wish I looked as great as she does. And, with the type of clothing she wears, how can you not help but notice. But, what I'm trying to say is that I was taken a-back when it was detailed that much on this site.

Also, you are 100 percent right when you say that the first show was not the Walton's. But, I really am disapointed in the first show because of that. They have awesome story lines, but I would be embarrassed to show a first-time watcher those shows because that's not how I view the Dukes. I am so proud, especially of seasons 3-7. To me, that is what the show is all about, good family values.

Is there some type of way that we could do this so everyone will be happy and have no hurt feelings. It is clearly obvious that TXZ045 wants this not to be deleted. I know that he doesn't want it moved either.

At first, I wanted it deleted. But, seeing as how everyone should be allowed to have there views, I definately thought about it more. How would I feel if I felt some way, and just because others disagreed with it, if they demanded it be deleted? Plus, the moderators thought that it was fine. Personally, I feel a little offended, but I also think that TXZ045 should say things that he wants to say. So, my answer changes to he should be able to keep it. But, I feel that maybe it could be moved to the Hazzard Swamp? Does that seem fair to you, TXZ045 and everyone else? I want to be fair, adn make everyone okay with it, but in the end, it's really up to the Moderators. So, we definately have a problem. If you are open, TXZ045 to other suggestions that we could compromise on, please let me know. I am REALLY trying to be fair and honest and trying to sit in your shoes.

Well, I apologize for the length, I tend to babble!8-) I do hope that I make some sense, and don't want to make things worse. Let me know what all of you think. I would like to get this figured out, and move along from here. There are so many other great things to do than get mad at fellow Dukes!8-)

Laura Duke

[RogerDuke]

Hey TXZ 045, Sure the Georgia episodes were rough. Do you know why they changed them? They changed them (toned them down) because IT'S WHAT THE PEOPLE WANTED!!! This is a democracy and the majority spoke.
What the majority on the Hazzardnet would say to you is this.....you began your stay here immediately causing trouble. That's okay though. All of us Hazzard folks like life a little on the wild side. However, your wild may be a little different than ours. Your "wild" seems to be focusing on the sexuality of our favorite actress. You are ONLY obligated to defend your actions to our moderators and the rest of us will live with their decisions because we love and respect them. However, if you would like to take up the challenge of defending your actions to me, I will happily engage in this debate. Let me start it by asking you this. Why do you feel it necessary to focus so intensely on the sexuality of Daisy? I look foward to continuing this debate as long as you would like or as long as our moderators will allow. Sincerly, Roger

[TXZ045]

Hey TXZ 045, Sure the Georgia episodes were rough. Do you know why they changed them? They changed them (toned them down) because IT'S WHAT THE PEOPLE WANTED!!! This is a democracy and the majority spoke.
What the majority on the Hazzardnet would say to you is this.....you began your stay here immediately causing trouble. That's okay though. All of us Hazzard folks like life a little on the wild side. However, your wild may be a little different than ours. Your "wild" seems to be focusing on the sexuality of our favorite actress. You are ONLY obligated to defend your actions to our moderators and the rest of us will live with their decisions because we love and respect them. However, if you would like to take up the challenge of defending your actions to me, I will happily engage in this debate. Let me start it by asking you this. Why do you feel it necessary to focus so intensely on the sexuality of Daisy? I look foward to continuing this debate as long as you would like or as long as our moderators will allow. Sincerly, Roger


The topic was posted in in August of 2006. The first 'oppositional' reply was posted on December 2nd, of 2007. If that is considered starting my 'stay' here causing 'trouble' then what is the definition of starting my 'stay' here not causing 'trouble'?

I attached the 'poll' to the top of the thread because I am obviously well aware it is a 'Democracy'.

As for your desire to 'debate' I see no need. Nor will I take part in it. If your 'upset' about the topic... thanks for taking over a year to finaly admit it.

I've stated numerous times if the mod(s) see fit to move/remove/delete the topic, then so be it,... it will be whatever it will be. One mod has already stated the topic was ok. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the mod or mods.

Thank you for your time and have a nice day good sir.

[Capt_Redneck]

First of all , Roger , please don't say the majority of HNet when it comes to saying something in a negative way about someone on here. TX just pointed out something that was interesting to people and he did it over a YEAR ago. He didn't focus on something as he all he did was just bring attention to a little detail.

Also please get your facts straight about the majority of the public getting the series moved to California. It was initially a cost factor and wanted to keep the series on TV. Keeping production on the road was too cost prohibitive at the time.

There should be no need to debate this or even bring this to point we have here. MaryAnne has spoken and is ok with everything. I understand some people are upset with this kind of topic, but please re-read the entire thread. You will NOT find anything sexual or obscene written or even alluded to.

Everyone has the right on here to voice their opinions about it. Ya'll have done it with the respect that would make the Dukes proud. But also think about this - As stated before, the topic was posted over a year ago and it took this long to say something about it, why? If it was too offensive to some of you why post on it at all, the thread could have been just a nother dead one then.

I'm Back
Darrell

[General Grant]

First off, I think Roger was saying that the Dukes toned down the content of the show because that is what people wanted, (and correct me Roger if I am wrong on that) not that people wanted it moved to California. Quite frankly, I don't have a preference where they film it, as long as it turns out as good as seasons 3-7 were. And that happened. Sorry Roger if I am misreading you here, too, but I think that you were saying that we shouldn't focus so hard on Cathy in that way. No, it was not written here, but I think that by watching so hard for malfunctions like that is in agreeance with what Roger was saying.
Also I'd like to put in my two cents from a few posts ago...
First off, please watch your language. This is a family site, and should be treated as such. Secondly, maybe you aren't a firm believer in family values or high moral standards, but I am. I do not stand behind them, or use them as a shield, I stand firmly on my beliefs.
About Daisy in jail on her fake birthday, that was from the first season, that didn't make the entire show. Unless you didn't get around to watching the rest of the series, you may have noticed that it was pretty much nonexistant (or toned down, which ever you prefer) beyond season 2. I never said Daisy wasn't good looking, I just believe that we should not view her in such a dishonoring way.
I loved the way you put everything Laura Duke, You have such a great perspective on things. I can tell that you really thought things out, and would like to thank you for your opinion. It was greatly apreciated that you give your thoughts in such a great way.
Now, that's my uncle Jesse (Roger) you are talking about. I would not be surprised to find that many posts take over a year to get answered. Simply because there are so many threads to look through. It would take the average person a LONG time to read through each and every one. Anyway, I would like to thank all of you for your opinions.
I do not want to come off as rude to any of you, or be a difficult person, but I just think that the Dukes if family entertainment, and shouldn't be treated as anything else. Heck, if I wanted to see the other stuff, I might as well watch the movie.
I'll catch y'all later.
General Grant

[Capt_Redneck]

Also I'd like to put in my two cents from a few posts ago...
First off, please watch your language. This is a family site, and should be treated as such. Secondly, maybe you aren't a firm believer in family values or high moral standards, but I am. I do not stand behind them, or use them as a shield, I stand firmly on my beliefs.


I do not want to come off as rude to any of you, or be a difficult person, but I just think that the Dukes if family entertainment, and shouldn't be treated as anything else. Heck, if I wanted to see the other stuff, I might as well watch the movie.
I'll catch y'all later.
General Grant


I watch the movie every now and then because I like it. :popcorn:
I watch the DVD's over and over too bceause I like it, but I prefer season 1 the best because to me it was more real. :wink:

What language are you talking about? My signature? Come off of it. I have had that on here for a very long time. So back off on that one as I never use bad language or call anyone anything here.

You seem to only agree on what YOU think is righteous and want it changed bacause of that. Yes the Dukes is Family entertainment and so is this site, and it is not a morals site either. Everyone has opinions on how the Dukes, coul have, should have, would have been. I love this site more than anything because it is a true Dukes fan site, but the morality issue is getting too much in a lot of topics. at least for me anyway.


Ya'll can say what you will about morals and such as you don't know mine or what I believe and don't make any insuations at all about it. I will NOT tell others how to live their lives or what to believe in or preach so please do the same on here if you have any respect. This is not the Moral Majority. I stand on my beliefs and convictions more than you will ever know , so don't go there at all. What you choose to follow or believe is your choice and your choice alone. I am not here to judge that will be done by someone else.


Darrell

[RogerDuke]

Capt. Redneck, I don't view trying to encourage high morals "negative".
TXZ045, maybe people weren't responding because they were using the old "ignore it and it will go away" mentality. That usually works....but for some reason you continue to push you obsession with pornographic Daisy.
Also, I still haven't gotten an answer to my question. You have done a great job of avoiding it though. Here it is again. Why do you feel it necessary to focus on the sexuality of Daisy? Until you answer that, I have zero respect for you.

[Capt_Redneck]

Capt. Redneck, I don't view trying to encourage high morals "negative".
.

When did I say that? Never said anything about "high morals" as negative. This is what I said in response to you

Capt_Redneck - First of all , Roger , please don't say the majority of HNet when it comes to saying something in a negative way about someone on here. TX just pointed out something that was interesting to people and he did it over a YEAR ago. He didn't focus on something as he all he did was just bring attention to a little detail.

Originally posted by RogerDuke - What the majority on the Hazzardnet would say to you is this.....you began your stay here immediately causing trouble.

That was what the reference was from.

Darrell

[RogerDuke]

Well, it's true though, he did begin his stay here by causing trouble. If that's negative, then it's negative. But, it's also a fact. He's a man with a plan. I don't know what that plan is but it has something to do with the egotistical great importance of his sexual desires. If the moderators think he's allowed to express those desires then I'm sure they won't mind me expressing my desires to shut him up.

[i1976]

Please, don't quarrel 'bout "wardrobe malfunction".
I think that DOH was a great show, and every fan watches it for several reasons. Nobody wants to deny family values in it, but..... it's normal that guys like Daisy (and not only in a "innocent" way, and it's not pornography). How many girls watch this show because of Bo and Luke (and me because of Enos)?; and I think that girls like to see Bo and Luke shirtless (I'd like to see Enos shirtless too, sometimes... :innocent:), and it's not pornography.
I don't think that TXZ045 is "obsessed" with Daisy's body, but not more obsessed than any normal guy.

I read all TXZ045's posts 'bout this thread, and I didn't find anything real offensive or pornographic 'bout Daisy.

[General Grant]

First off
Capt Redneck post #29 When you are saying "What language are you referring to? My Signature? Come off of it..." No, I was not referring to your signature. I have better things to do than critique what people choose as their signatures. Next time before you get all up in arms, please know what is going on.
Don't everyone agree with what they hold true? Yes, I do want it changed, not only because I agree with it, but because I think it is showing (again, if it doesn't offend anyone, I am going to use the word) high moral character for us Dukes to show that we do not watch the show because of that type of thing. I do not think that any of us are here to judge. In fact, I think we all want the same thing, and that is to make the site better. We all just have different opinions about how to do it.
For now, I am going to stand on what I think is right, unless someone says something that can change my opinion, and that has been known to happen. But I don't think that getting all ticked off and being rude is the way to get an opinion across. That also includes me, for those of you who think I am goody-two shoes!

General Grant

[Capt_Redneck]

First off
Capt Redneck post #29 When you are saying "What language are you referring to? My Signature? Come off of it..." No, I was not referring to your signature. I have better things to do than critique what people choose as their signatures. Next time before you get all up in arms, please know what is going on.
Don't everyone agree with what they hold true? Yes, I do want it changed, not only because I agree with it, but because I think it is showing (again, if it doesn't offend anyone, I am going to use the word) high moral character for us Dukes to show that we do not watch the show because of that type of thing. I do not think that any of us are here to judge. In fact, I think we all want the same thing, and that is to make the site better. We all just have different opinions about how to do it.
For now, I am going to stand on what I think is right, unless someone says something that can change my opinion, and that has been known to happen. But I don't think that getting all ticked off and being rude is the way to get an opinion across. That also includes me, for those of you who think I am goody-two shoes!

General Grant

Seems to me that you don't like people having other opinions about the Dukes. My sig has been there for a couple of years now, way before you joined this site. I like your statement about me getting all up in arms. That is funny as I am just doing the same thing as you - trying to stand up for what I think is right.

Please tell me where I have gotten ticked off and am rude to anyone on this thread. I haven't ever called anyone anything bad or am rude or anything close to it. So where you get that from my post is beyond me. Just don't want to hear about the high morals you so want everyone to follow on here.

What is wrong with this site that you want changed to make it better so you say? You want it to be strictly of high moral character? Come on now this HazzardNet, go and read all the posts from the beginning of this site.

There is a Montgomery Gentry song "What Do Ya Think About That" I love and speaks almost what I think. Here are some the lyrics.

"Shot a little eight ball down at the pool hall
Drink a beer with my friends
Now don't judge me and I won't judge you
Cause we all get judged in the end"

"Some people care about what other people think
Worry about what they say
Let a little gossip
Coming from a loose lip ruin a perfect day
Say, blah, blah, blah, just a jacking their jaws
Got a letta roll off-a my back
I don't give a dern what other people think
What do ya think about that"


I'm gone
Darrell

[TXZ045]

Capt. Redneck, I don't view trying to encourage high morals "negative".
TXZ045, maybe people weren't responding because they were using the old "ignore it and it will go away" mentality. That usually works....but for some reason you continue to push you obsession with pornographic Daisy.
Also, I still haven't gotten an answer to my question. You have done a great job of avoiding it though. Here it is again. Why do you feel it necessary to focus on the sexuality of Daisy? Until you answer that, I have zero respect for you.


What you view as 'continue'ing' to 'push' an 'obsession' with 'pornographic' Daisy translates to me replying to a topic? .... interesting.

And as for this 'question' you have for me. It would be humanly impossible for me to care any less than I already do about how much 'respect' you do, and or don't have for me.

However, to answer your question I feel its important to focus on Daisy as as 'whole' not a partial. If I see her as a 'whole' and part of that 'whole' is the sexuality side included... why should I have to stop just because some other human being feels different.....

And if Daisy would be so up set about ppl seeing her extra stuff why would she pose for a bra-less photo wearing a thin white shirt with water on it in all the right places?.... if she was so overly-concerned about how her Dukes Fans viewed her back in the day why would she risk 'upsetting' them by posing for said photograph? I'm sure most of you have seen the photo I speak of, I would attach it to my reply, but it will prolly just 'upset' somebody so I'll leave it off however it can be found through a google search using the terms: catherine-bach should be the 3rd or so site that comes up.

Respect me or not, tiz of no concern to me. I am not one of these 'try to please all the people all the time' types. If somebody is disrespectful to me, I simply view it as their 'personal' opinion. We all have one, some of us have many. Just because you are of one particular 'personal' opinion does not mean that everyone else is, or should have to 'agree' with yours.

And the show was 'toned down' but there was still plenty of T&A through out the rest of the shows run. If you wish to deny that, then like Maryanne said, what show have you been watching all these years?

Thank you for your time, and good day.

[General Grant]

Hey everyone
Capt. Redneck...Calm down about your signature. I never said that it was horrible or that I had a problem with it. When I said that you were getting all up in arms, I was referring to you getting upset on post # 29 when you misinterpreted (which may have been my fault) that I had a problem with your signature. As for my saying "But I don't think that getting all ticked off and rude is the way to get an opinion across" I was talking generally. We are all getting somewhat upset about the whole thing.
I must be hard to understand, so next time I will try to be more clear as to what I am writing so it doesn't get so confusing.
Thank you for the lyrics, yes, I am well aware of the song. I, too, own a radio!!
As for the site,there is nothing wrong with it, but there is ALWAYS room for improvement!

Moral Majority Signing out!
General Grant

[DaneyDuke]

Deleting or moving this thread serves no purpose.

One thread/ poster on a message board does not define a website, the forums of Hazzardnet are one section of Hazzardnet.com.

I voted to leave the topic as is. I took into consideration that Catherine Bach appeared in a 1970s movie titled Nicole. It featured nudity and intimate moments between female characters.

[Capt_Redneck]

Hey everyone
Capt. Redneck...Calm down about your signature. I never said that it was horrible or that I had a problem with it. When I said that you were getting all up in arms, I was referring to you getting upset on post # 29 when you misinterpreted (which may have been my fault) that I had a problem with your signature. As for my saying "But I don't think that getting all ticked off and rude is the way to get an opinion across" I was talking generally. We are all getting somewhat upset about the whole thing.
I must be hard to understand, so next time I will try to be more clear as to what I am writing so it doesn't get so confusing.
Thank you for the lyrics, yes, I am well aware of the song. I, too, own a radio!!
As for the site,there is nothing wrong with it, but there is ALWAYS room for improvement!

Moral Majority Signing out!
General Grant


Still trying to fugure out what I need to calm down about as nothing you said about my signature ever bothered me or got me up in arms.

But hey, whatever you think.

Darrell

[Laura Duke]

:p Hey Everyone!
Wow! I checked this yesterday morning, and a lot has happened in 24 hours.

First off, it seems that my letter possibly offended and upset some people? It seems that after I wrote my letter, everyone got really upset. If that is the case, I really am sorry. That was never my intention. If you could, please re-read my letter and tell me if there is something that upset any of you. I would be willing to talk it out with any of you.

Also, I feel that we are straying off the subject a little. It was about a subject matter, and it almost seems that there is a little bit of some personal insults flying at one another? "Dukes don't fight Dukes," is what Jesse Duke would say on the Dukes of Hazzard if Bo and Luke fought each other. I think the same should hold true here. I think that all of us respect and care for one another, and I don't think that ANY of us want to fight. It's great that we all stand up for what we think is fair and right, that takes courage! So, I respect and admire each and every one of you for that! It's NEVER easy to do that. But, I feel that things are getting to tense.

After re-reading, it also seems that between a couple of parties there could be some connections that are crossed? Do you think that it could be possible for all of us to skip this particular thread for a few days and maybe come back a little more refreshed? I think if we did that, it may change the perspecive and maybe come back with a different point of view? For me, sometimes just thinking about things, makes me see things differently. Or, is it possible to set up a chat time for this discussion. I just really feel that there's a bit of a problem, and if we would talk it out, it might work a little better. A live chat might be better than writing back-and-forth about it. What's everyone's thoughts on this? Forget my idea? Like it? Please let me know.

I would like everyone to respond to my suggestion. I just feel that the way things are going now, it's heading for disaster really quickly. It seems like everyone on the HazzardNet feels they have to pick a side and fight one another. I kind of feel things are getting nasty. Or, maybe I'm possibly over-reacting?

Let me know what all of you think. If we don't get this resolved soon, I'm going to have to resort to something that NOBODY wants, I'm going to have to start telling jokes. And, people say that I tell the stupidest jokes in the world! :-P You wouldn't want that, would you? :-P

Also, extremely changing the subject here, I hope that all of you had a nice Christmas. Have a wonderful New Year. And you all have one awesome weekend, okay!

Laura Duke

[RogerDuke]

Wow, I have so many thoughts on this but I'll just write the most significant ones. Daney is right by saying that one message board does not define a website. Let me add to that...one pervert does not define a community.
Laura's right that "Dukes don't fight Dukes"
Has everybody heard the WWJD thing? I like to add to it by also asking, What would Jesse do? When Bo, Luke, Enos, Cooter, etc joke about Daisy's sexuality it's different when an outsider does it. You can't compare "If we weren't cousins I'd marry you"....to....how Daisy was treated by men on the show who degraded her (for example, the guys who Boss bought the Bo and Luke masks for). When the boys fought them, it WASN'T Duke fighting Duke, it was Dukes fighting perverts. That's why I don't feel bad about criticizing TXZ for his behavior. Daisy is my neice and he will not treat her like that without a fight. He is not only insulting her family but he is also degrading all the women on the Hazzardnet. So, what would Jesse do? He'd protect his family and his niece's honor. Does anybody remember a single scene in 7 years that Jesse degraded a woman? Bo and Luke punched people who degrade women. TXZ doesn't need punched. What he does need is to have a mentor like Uncle Jesse to show him what it's like to be a real man.

[BoJamesDuke]

Okay....I'm gonna stick my nose in because i'm nosy and like a good argument now and again.

I have to say I'm on the fence about this. While it is kinda wrong and sounds quite preverted that you actually look for Daisy Duke breast shots during the show and take screen caps of them, its also the same for girls (but not me because I dont really like that kinda stuff) to hunt around for the infamous shots of the boys showing their 'you-know-what's' through their jeans. Now when we look at those, everyone gets the giggles - even Tom and John.

Dukes was a family show, yup, but also true in the beginning it was a great deal more loose in the terms we're talking about. What I think they hoped to achieve by toning it down was to make it more open to the younger generation to be able to view it without having them exposed to the kind of risque stuff they had during the first season. However, if you took it all out completly, lets be honest, it would have been turned into a kids show. Kids watch it for the charactes, teenagers watch it for the characters but also the fast car, for boys Daisy Duke, and for girls Bo and Luke. It was a bonus that they also learnt about all the family values the show holds along the way. Unfortunatly, in order to reach a target audience, you have to put something that would appeal to them thus Dukes had to have something for everyone.

Now for the wadrobe malfunctions - there are so many to do with the three main characters. The jeans for the boys were incredibly tight - and as Tom said - maybe they didn't have to be quite so tight. And yes, Daisy may have fallen out of her top every so often during the show but that is a long stretch from her purposfully taking it off in the show. Plus, unless you go through and purposly pause the DVD's and zoom in on the image, the malfunction isn't that noticable anyway until 'someone' points it out. I never noticed, and I never noticed the boys malfunctions until someone showed me a picture when I was about 16. That was only two years ago.

So therefore, I can't say it was wrong for TXZ to post this at all, it is a malfunction that they made just as the boy's jeans were an equal malfunction that the girls tend to notice. However, what I do find wrong is the fact he ZOOMED IN to see that?! That I think is wrong, and that is the kind of thing we DO NOT need to know about. What you decide to do with your DVD's is your choice but please do not tell us about your, I have to say, perverted way of finding those malfunctions.

And that's me done. No offence meant to anyone on the board. :-D

[General Grant]

Hey Y'all
I agree with what you are saying, Roger, about Jesse defending Daisy's honor. And, this is degrading to all of the girls here. It seems to me that it would make one wonder if that is the only reason people look at them. Not because of their personalities, but becasue they are just being disgusting and totally inappropriate. BoJamesDuke, I agree with you, I also do not like that kind of stuff. Which is why I don't understand why guys would zoom in on Daisy, and girls would zoom in on Bo, Luke, or any of the other male characters on the show.
I don't understand why you would take a family show, and twist it into something like that where you go looking for trouble(the malfunctions.) Yes, certain malfunctions are fun to see, for example, if someone messed up a line, or tripped over something, or even if in a certain shot you can see one of the cameras. But, I draw the line at "wardrobe malfunctions." They simply are not acceptable. Now, I am willing to bet that you'd almost have to be studying the character to pick up on something like that.
One last thing to BoJamesDuke, and that is thank you for stating your opinions in a nice manner. I think you really have a way of getting a point across without coming off as being rude. So, a sincere thanks for that.

General Grant

[MaryAnne]

Okay y'all, I think folks have spoken and spoken...and spoken on this topic. And I have the feeling things are just going to keep going to the point where y'all are just kicking dirt on each other's shoes. Some of that's already started. We can discuss this until Judgement Day and there's no way everyone is gonna be happy with the results.

Let it go folks. Let's move on!

[TXZ045]

I dont consider it 'perverted', more like 'human'. I guess I need to be more like a robot. And for the record, I noticed the 'malfunctions' at full speed, not slow motion. And this is a public forum, so if I choose to 'tell' others what I do with my DVD's, then I will, and I did, and Im not ashamed of it all. The amount of 'respect' I do or dont get around here is of no concern to me. If I am to become, or have been the 'outcast' then so be it, Ill be the member of Hazzard County that lives in the hills and comes to town on occassion.

Its actualy hilarious to see how much some of you are overreacting about next to nothing... pushing your 'personal' belief systems on others in an attempt to change their way of thinking about one particular thing or another.
It is what it is.... paint whatever color you want... it is still human nature and every human is different. I refuse to deny that I am a human being with a right, and will of my own to do and or say, anything/everything I please. If it 'upsets' others... then so be it.... if your offended then maybe you needed to be offended... thats healthy sometimes ya know.

Thanks for all the replies.... afterall, never hurts to stir up some dirt from time to time... if ya didn't wanna read it, ya didnt have too... same goes for anyone else who stumbles apon this forum. If your afraid those ppl who are new to the place will read it... then I guess that means your afraid that humans are visiting this forum instead of robots... although there are google bots and other such spiders and stuff that do roam the net collecting information for search results... so technically speaking both humans and bots are visiting this forum.

Seems some of you are just playing a 'role'/'characters' here on the HazzardNet-Forums. Like an online actor of sorts. Chances are some of those same cats have prolly checked out some of the 'malfunctions' themselves, then got online and continued to play the 'role'/'character' they feel they have to play on here. If I am the bad guy in the mask.... then so be it... I can handle ppl wrongly viewing my online personality that way.... its all good.
It takes one to know one. And if I get falsely dubbed as 'one' then again so be it.

For the record I received numerous personal/private messages here on this forum from other members asking me 'can you send me the screen-shots'. All from different ppl... its not like Im the 'Only' person who is taking notice of the things the show wanted us to notice about Daisy.

Like I think it was in the 'Hazzard Hustle' episode in Season 5 when Vance or Coy told Daisy after she got all dressed up like a old-lady to go into Boss and Roscoe's illegal bookie joint where everyone was betting on horse races and such.... Daisy said "do you think boss will recognize me now?" and Coy or Vance said " I think you covered up all the reasons they know ya for" or something to that effect.... that right there blatantly points out exactly what Im talking about. If I was not meant to 'look' at Daisy's many good features then why is the window open for passers by? Why did she pose for that photo wearing only a thin white shirt, no bra, and with water in all the right places? Why did she take part in the 'Nicole' movie? even if it was a year before the Dukes... LOL! @ people saying she would be 'upset' by people noticing her 'extras' on the Dukes.... sheesh.... get real.

And as for the idea about a LIVE Chat to discuss all of this.... I dont see the point.... especialy if Im expected to change my human brain wave patterns (individual thought patterns) at the end of the chat, thats just plain flat out not going to happen. And I suspect the 'role' players here would refuse to change their 'online' characters 'individual thought patterns' either.

I have not one single problem with agree'ing to 'disagree' on this topic. Thats life... Thanks again for the replies.... keep it tween the ditches and Im gone, over and out.

[RogerDuke]

Well you're right about one thing TXV, we're not going to change each others minds. You're always going to believe that your right to express your perverted opinions is much more important than my right to express myself by pointing it out. I see you had to add more graphic details in your last post. As long as you continue to express yourself, so will I. I'm not sure why you want to be here. Wouldn't your freedom of expression for this type of subject matter be less inhibited if you got on the millions of "adult" websites that the internet offers?

[TXZ045]

Well you're right about one thing TXV, we're not going to change each others minds. You're always going to believe that your right to express your perverted opinions is much more important than my right to express myself by pointing it out. I see you had to add more graphic details in your last post. As long as you continue to express yourself, so will I. I'm not sure why you want to be here. Wouldn't your freedom of expression for this type of subject matter be less inhibited if you got on the millions of "adult" websites that the internet offers?


Where did I get more 'graphic' in my last post? If your talking about the white shirt with no bra, and water in all the right places.... then you missed a previous post where that was already mentioned by myself, so technically speaking it would have occurred before my 'last' post and yet, in a 'previous' post. Either way, its not like that language is prohibited around here, and if it is then somebody should be enforcing the 'rules'.

And for the record I dont think my 'right' to express what you falsely refer to as 'perverted opinions' is more 'important' than your right to 'point it out' they are both equaly valuable rights.

And I am here because of the same reason you are here. I am a Life Long Dukes of Hazzard Fan. You can either accept it, or deny it. Tiz of no concern to me.

Have a nice new year good sir.

[BoJamesDuke]

Hey, sometimes in life you have to agree to disagree. I never said I agreed with either side and it was my opinion that it was slightly perverted to go looking for shots of Daisy with her breasts falling out her top, my opinion no offense meant. I don't mind what you do with your time, I just thought that maybe it was slightly inappropriate to post it on the Catherine Bach section and should have been placed in the Hazzard Swamp area really.

But hey, I respect your decision TX to go looking for these kind of things, if that's what you want to do then hey no problem with me so long as you dont go pushing it in my face. I respect the fact you gave people a choice to look at these things with the link and everything but I only ask that maybe you choose more carefully where to place these kind of topics is all :-) I didn't mean to cause offense or insult and I hope that we can be friends despite all this ruckus. Hazzardnet is supposed to be one big family, and sometimes family do things other members dont like, that's life, that's humanity as you say. So lets shake hands, have a beer and forget this. As Maryanne says, lets move on but together ;-)

[Capt_Redneck]

Well you're right about one thing TXV, we're not going to change each others minds. You're always going to believe that your right to express your perverted opinions is much more important than my right to express myself by pointing it out. I see you had to add more graphic details in your last post. As long as you continue to express yourself, so will I. I'm not sure why you want to be here. Wouldn't your freedom of expression for this type of subject matter be less inhibited if you got on the millions of "adult" websites that the internet offers?



What a minute there. Where was anything perverted in this topic? Pointing out some scenes is perverted? Well then it is just as perverted as trying to understand some of opinions expressed on this topic. Please do not compare this to something on "adult" websites. Maybe it would have been better if you didn't refer to TX as perverted or say he has "perverted opinions".

It seems , from what I read, that a select few of you had objections to a post that is over a year old. And it turned in to a semi-religious sermonon morals and values. That is all fine and dandy, but each has there own and do not need to hear it "preached" like it has on this topic.

We are all DOH fans and that is why we are here. I loved what TX wrote a few posts ago.

"Seems some of you are just playing a 'role'/'characters' here on the HazzardNet-Forums. Like an online actor of sorts. Chances are some of those same cats have prolly checked out some of the 'malfunctions' themselves, then got online and continued to play the 'role'/'character' they feel they have to play on here. If I am the bad guy in the mask.... then so be it... I can handle ppl wrongly viewing my online personality that way.... its all good."


I'm gone
Darrell

[RogerDuke]

I hate to tell you this TXZ but our rights aren't equal. When our founding fathers framed the Constitution they did NOT do it so that perverted things can be protected. People like you and certain lawyers have twisted their original intentions so much, we don't know right from wrong anymore. That's because some people want to justify their own immorality and push it on other people, then hide behind what they think is the Constitution. There's a saying that goes "Evil flourishes when good folks do nothing" This website is dedicated to goodness and if the moderators "do nothing" about you, that's their choice. I guess we'll just have to wait and hear from them.

[Capt_Redneck]

Enough of this crap.

Stop with the name calling . Stop with the insinuations and accusations.
Enough of the dirt kicking. There is no need for any of this any more.

We are all Dukes Fans here and that is why we are here. Everybody can have THEIR own opinion on what they think and observe about the Dukes.

Maryanne, Brian or Meadow - please lock this thread up.

Darrell

[DaneyDuke]

I hate to tell you this TXZ but our rights aren't equal. When our founding fathers framed the Constitution they did NOT do it so that perverted things can be protected. People like you and certain lawyers have twisted their original intentions so much, we don't know right from wrong anymore. That's because some people want to justify their own immorality and push it on other people, then hide behind what they think is the Constitution. There's a saying that goes "Evil flourishes when good folks do nothing" This website is dedicated to goodness and if the moderators "do nothing" about you, that's their choice. I guess we'll just have to wait and hear from them.


Roman Polanski once said "What's horror to you, may not be horror to me."
That might not be the exact quote, pretty close.

A Hazzardnet moderator/ adminstrator commented on this thread - posts #21 & #44.

[RogerDuke]

Roman Polanski, he's the guy that raped the little girl in the U.S. and then fled to Europe and has still not been tried for it...apparently he didn't consider that "horrible" enough to go to trial. I'd consider the source.
Since we're doing quotes, how about this one...
"You deserve what you tolerate"

[MaryAnne]

This website is dedicated to goodness and if the moderators "do nothing" about you, that's their choice. I guess we'll just have to wait and hear from them.

What am I? Chopped grits? I have posted in this thread a few times already. Would y'all rather Brian and Mufn chime on this one? I can bring it to their attention. I have no problem with that. Apparently my handling of this situation hasn't been well received. Sorry, I refuse to resort to having to police this place to the extreme. However, I have not been doing nothing. I've been watching you guys discuss and debate this. I think I was a tad erroneous in my observation about respect tho'. I've been greatly disappointed by some of the responses here.

Therefore, I'm going to do something. I'm locking this thread.